New Efficacies for Audience/Performer Interactivity and Responsive Narrative in Immersive Theatre

Authors

  • Brent Olson
  • Paula MacDowell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56198/A6PFYVWSC

Keywords:

immersive theatre, youth, interactive performance, digital avatars, student agency, community engagement

Abstract

Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has substantial possibilities for students to learn remotely through exploration, collaboration, and socialization. IVR is well suited to theatre, which relies on interpersonal attributes to demonstrate actor relationships and character development. IVR theatre can break down the fourth wall to connect audience members and actors in the same physical space, thereby removing the barrier of the stage and placing the audience within the storyline. In this study, a high-caliber youth theatre group was tasked with writing, workshopping, directing, rehearsing, and performing a play for a live audience in AltspaceVR. Grounded by current literature on the affordances and limitations of IVR for learning, this research followed six high school students imagining, designing, and delivering an immersive theatrical performance. Findings report how youth are experimenting with immersive technologies to take traditional theatre in new directions, including audience interaction, responsive narrative, and actors/actresses performing as digital avatars. We highlight pedagogical strategies and design recommendations for working with youth to integrate IVR theatre experiences in secondary education.

References

Gochfeld, D., Brenner, C., Layng, K., Herscher S., DeFanti, C. Olko, M., Shinn, D., Riggs, S., Fernández-Vara, C., & Perlin, K. (2018). Holojam in wonderland: Immersive mixed reality theater. Leonardo, 51(4), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01644

Salihbegovic, F. (2020). The encounter with the real: What can Complicite’s theatre performance the encounter teaches us about the future of VR narratives? Body, Space & Technology, 19(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.336

Kawulich, B.B., & D’Alba, A. (2018). Teaching qualitative research methods with second life, a 3-dimensional online virtual environment. Virtual Reality 23, 375–384.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0353-4

Valenti, S., Lund, B., & Wang, T. (2020). Virtual reality as a tool for student orientation in distance education programs. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i2.11937

Johnston, E., Olivas, G., Steele, P., Smith, C., & Bailey, L. (2018). Exploring pedagogical foundations of existing virtual reality educational applications: A content analysis study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(4), 414-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517745560

Onyesolu, M.O., Nwasor, V.C., Ositanwosu, O.E., & Iwegbuna, O.N. (2013). Pedagogy: Instructivism to socio-constructivism through virtual reality. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040907

Biggs, J.B. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

Jin, S. (2009). Avatars mirroring the actual self-versus projecting the ideal self: The effects of self-priming on interactivity and immersion in an exergame, Wii Fit. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12(6), 761-765. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0130

Downloads

Published

06-06-2022

How to Cite

New Efficacies for Audience/Performer Interactivity and Responsive Narrative in Immersive Theatre. (2022). Immersive Learning Research - Practitioner, 1(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.56198/A6PFYVWSC

Similar Articles

1-10 of 114

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)