Comparison of Standard 2D and Virtual Reality-Based Teaching of Moral Dilemmas: the Case of the Trolley Problem

Authors

  • Sarune Savickaite University of Exeter, Psychology Department
  • Rory Gallagher University of Glasgow
  • Yichan Dong University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56198/rnrtng25

Keywords:

Moral Education, Virtual Reality, 2D Teaching, Trolley Problem, Ethics

Abstract

This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of 2D and Virtual Reality (VR) methods for teaching moral dilemmas, using the Trolley Problem as a case study. Twenty participants, divided equally into 2D and VR groups, were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) and Utilitarian Scale (US). Quantitative results revealed a nuanced impact: the 2D method improved fairness and altruism, while the VR method slightly enhanced utilitarian reasoning but risked distraction from abstract moral principles. Qualitative feedback highlighted VR’s immersive potential to increase engagement but raised concerns about its suitability for abstract moral reasoning and practical limitations such as equipment cost and discomfort for some users. These findings underline the importance of integrating both approaches to balance immersion and structured learning. The study contributes to the discourse on technological advancements in moral education, emphasizing the need for tailored applications.

Downloads

Published

14-06-2025

How to Cite

Comparison of Standard 2D and Virtual Reality-Based Teaching of Moral Dilemmas: the Case of the Trolley Problem. (2025). Immersive Learning Research - Practitioner, 1(1), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.56198/rnrtng25

Similar Articles

1-10 of 123

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)