Autonomy Illusion in Immersive Virtual Learning Environments

Authors

  • Michael MacKay
  • Irwin DeVries

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56198/A6PFYZU3N

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Virtual Learning Environments, Presence, Pedagogy, Learner Autonomy

Abstract

With the prevalence of virtual reality (VR), new research has focused on its applications in various fields, including education. The notion of presence has been touted as advantageous for learning in the virtual environment; however, there has been little research on the subject concerning learning. This paper examines one of the themes from the interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) of a pedagogical informed virtual learning experience simulating the local solar system through the lens of five grade nine students. Data for this study was gathered through semi-structured interviews and video observations of the experience to understand the relationship presence has on learning in virtual environments. This paper highlights the sense of autonomy participants felt that led to a phenomenon identified as autonomy illusion. Autonomy illusion is the feeling of control over learning brought on by the removal of conventional classroom delimiting factors in place of environmentally designed delimitations, creating the illusion of freedom described as a symbiotic dichotomy of two opposing features, pedagogical freedom and environmental imposed delimitations, which help define the illusion.

References

Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549-3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138

Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x

Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12135

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

Smith, J. A., & Shinebourne, P. (2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 73–82). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-005

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Sage.

Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2021). Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259-000

Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic Learning Environments. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32

Downloads

Published

2022-06-06

How to Cite

MacKay, M., & DeVries, I. (2022). Autonomy Illusion in Immersive Virtual Learning Environments. Immersive Learning Research - Practitioner, 1(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.56198/A6PFYZU3N

Most read articles by the same author(s)